Everyday design products and long-term memory the colour influence on emotional response and perceived usability
Main Article Content
Abstract
Colour is an important component of product design and can influence usage interaction. This study aimed to study the influence of the colour of everyday products on the emotional response and perceived usability of senior adult females. Thirty women between 60 and 80 years old participated, who evaluated clay sausage roaster in three different colours, based on two protocols: Emotional Response Cards (ERC) and Perceived Usability Cards (PUC). The product in the “Terracotta” colour was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) better evaluated (emotional response and perceived usability) than the products in the other colours (“green” and “grey”). The colour “Terracotta” was decisive in confirming that the memory factor of long-term experiences contributed to the results achieved. The application of colours in the design of products aimed at older users must consider long-term experiences and be treated as an inclusivity factor.
Downloads
1. Introduction
Many people who interact with everyday products experience situations that interfere with their level of satisfaction. In fact, different studies focused on use interaction processes have been developed (Unruh & Canciglieri Junior, 2018) and, despite there being a consensus that product design should meet users' expectations, there is still a lack of investigations that explain how attributes inherent to product design can influence emotional response and perceived usability. Among the various attributes of product design, colour stands out, which is based on the perception, or phenomenon of receiving a stimulus, through the visual sense, and processing information, attributing meanings to it (Moreira da Silva, 2013). The perception of colour can be influenced by physiological, cultural, age, gender, and other factors, which generate cognitive reactions in users, influencing their emotional sensations and behaviours (Heller, 2017). Therefore, colour can interfere with the perception of product composition elements, such as volume, weight, size, temperature, texture and others, which results in different emotional responses (Csillag, 2015). In general, the theoretical understanding of how the colour of a product influences emotion has already been discussed by Na & Suk (2014), Ding et al. (2021) and Alves et al. (2022); and also in the usability domain by Sonderegger & Sauer (2010) and Bonfim et al. (2023). On the other hand, there are still few empirical studies that analyze the influence of colours on product design, from the point of view of emotional responses and perceived usability. The present study aimed to analyze the influence of colour on the emotional response and perceived usability, during the interaction of senior adult females, with everyday products with the same practical function, but with different colours. This has allowed the authors to understand which aspects of interaction contribute to improving users' interaction with products.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Characteristics and Ethical Aspects
The present study is characterized as inductive and descriptive/exploratory. The independent variable is colour applied to everyday products. The dependent variables are emotional response and perceived usability. The ethical aspects met the principles of integrity, proportionality, confidentiality, privacy and data protection (including anonymization and coding). Furthermore, an Informed Consent Form (in Portuguese language) was applied.
2.2. Sampling
Sampling was characterized as convenience and non-probabilistic. The inclusion criteria were: women between 60 and 80 years old; failure to report vision problems; the report of experience using the object of study; and not participate in professional activities in the area of Design. Such criteria guaranteed real experience in using the object of study, strengthening the precepts of specificity of users and tasks, in addition to limiting the judgment required in the protocols (dependent variables) to the colours of the products (independent variable). The sample size was defined as n=30, following the precepts of Serdar et al. (2021). Therefore, 30 women participated, with an average age of 66.27 years (s.d. 4.41 years).
2.3. Object of Study
The object of study is a traditional Portuguese clay sausage roaster (Figure 1), shaped like a “boat” (where ethyl alcohol and grape marc spirit for the flame is deposited); and transverse rods (where the sausage is deposited), being produced by hand in brickworks and presenting a glazed finish. The definition of this object of study was previously planned and was directly related to the definition of the sample, as it is strongly present in Portuguese gastronomic culture. Therefore, it presents a hedonic relationship with senior adults users. According to Haaksma et al. (2018), emotional and usability evaluations are more easily applicable to hedonic products, when compared to utilitarian products, which corroborates this methodological option. The predominant colour of this product on the market is “terracotta” [NCS S 4050-Y60R] (Figure 1-a), but for the present study, products were developed in two other colours: “Green” [NCS S 2050-G30Y] ( Figure 1-b) and “Grey” [NCS S 4010-R90B] (Figure 1-c).
Figure 1. Clay sausage roaster, in the colours “Terracota” [NCS S 4050-Y60R] (A), “Green” [NCS S 2050-G30Y] (B) and “Grey” [NCS S 4010-R90B] (C) Source: the authors
2.4. Protocols
The following research protocols were used:
- Emotional Response Cards (ERC), a non-verbal self-report instrument adapted from PrEmo-2 (Desmet, 2018), composed of 14 cards, with representations of emotions with positive valences (Desire, Satisfaction, Pride, Hope, Joy, Admiration and Fascination) and negative valence (Disgust, Anger, Sadness, Fear, Shame, Borebom and Contempt);
- Perceived Usability Cards (PUC), a verbal and emoji self-report instrument, adapted from the Likert scale with three anchors (Bonfim et al. 2023), with the verbal information “easy to use”, “normal use” and “hard to use” (in the native Portuguese language) and a consonant emoji (Alismail & Zhang, 2020).
2.5. Methodological Procedures
Interaction activities occurred voluntarily and individually (Figure 2), with prior application of the ICF. The sequence of presentation of products, ERCs and PUCs was randomized. Initially, it was reported that, although the products were similar in shape, they were different in colour. This perception was confirmed by each of the participants, who reported having already used their primary function (sausage roaster). With the availability of the ERCs, an oral instruction explained how, arbitrarily, the cards should be associated with the colours of the products. At least a single card must be associated with each of the three products; and there were no limits on the number of cards per product.
Figure 2. Interaction activities, with application of the ERCs, developed on the [omitted for blind review] premises (A); and in a traditional district of the [omitted for blind review] city (B and C) Source: the authors
At the end of the association, a photographic image guaranteed the record for data tabulation. After removing the ERCs, the PUCs were presented, with similar instructions and the express need to associate each card with a single colour. At the end, a photographic image ensured the record for data tabulation, completing the data collection stage. In general, all participants demonstrated interest and understanding with the instruments and procedures. After tabulating the data, descriptive statistical analysis was applied to obtain the frequency and relative percentage of the dependent variables. The Cochran's Q test (p < 0.05) was used to compare the degree of heterogeneity of RCTs given its property in comparing the proportion of categorical dichotomous responses (Aslam, 2023). In addition, the McNemar's test was used, indicated to compare responses of the same participants when exposed to different stimuli, expressed through paired binomial data (Pembury Smith & Ruxton, 2020). The degree of association between the ERCs was verified using Cramer's V coefficient, whose results close to zero suggest the absence of associations between the ERCs; and V > 0.25 indicate a strong degree of association (Akoglu, 2018). Regarding the PUC results, the Friedman test was applied to verify the heterogeneity of responses for different colours, as it compares different samples of paired data, expressed through ordinal responses (Comerlato et al., 2020). As a post hoc test, the Wilcoxon test (paired) with Bonferroni Correction was used, comparing the responses attributed to pairs of colours, since they came from the same participants.
3. Results
The ERC results, in frequency and relative percentage (Figure 3), indicate that three emotions with a positive valence (Desire, Hope and Joy) and four emotions with a negative valence (Disgust, Anger, Shame and Contempt) were sensitive to the participants' emotional perception. (p ≤ 0.05 - Cochran's Q test), confirming that colour was the factor that influenced this association. The degree of association between the ERCs indicated a value of V > 0.25. (Cramer's V coefficient) only among Shame and Contempt cards. The other associations presented V close to zero, demonstrating some independence in the choice of ERCs and indicating that the choice of a card does not necessarily imply the choice of another card together, reinforcing that the instrument was suitable for the present study.
The results of the PUC, frequency and relative percentage (Figure 4) confirm that the perception of usability was significantly (p ≤ 0.05 - Friedman test and Wilcoxon test) influenced by the colours of the products (independent variable).
Figure 3. Emotional Response index, described in frequency (and relative percentage) for each of the emotions and each of the colours Source: the authors
Figure 4. Perceived Usability index, described in frequency (and relative percentage), for each of the perceptions and each of the colours Source: the authors
4. Discussion
The design of a product can be considered one of the most important elements that influence use interaction, impacting (positively or negatively) users' emotional responses and perceived usability. Its physical structure, made up of numerous attributes, among which colour stands out, is what materializes the user interface. The present study, of an empirical nature, aimed to analyze the influence of colour on the emotional response and perceived usability of users, during the interaction with a product for everyday use.
In general, the results indicate that, in relation to emotional response, the colours of the products were decisive for the significant differences (p ≤ 0.05 - Cochran's Q test). In this case, in the emotions Desire, Hope and Joy (positive valence), the terracotta colour product was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) better evaluated than the grey colour, with the same difference occurring (p ≤ 0.05) in relation to the green product. Regarding the emotions Disgust, Anger, Shame and Contempt (negative valence), the product in grey colour was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) worse evaluated when compared to products in terracotta and green colour (this last comparison is not observed in the Contempt emotion), being highly significant (p ≤ 0.01) in the Shame emotion. When the analysis was restricted to perceived usability results, the colours of the products were also responsible for strongly significant differences (p ≤ 0.001 - Friedman test). When comparing the colours in pairs of results, the grey product again emerged as the worst evaluated, when compared with the green and terracotta products (p ≤ 0.001).
Most participants expressed “strangeness” with the green and grey colours applied to the clay sausage roaster, as they only knew this product in the “terracotta” colour. This “strangeness” was probably enhanced by the experience memory factor, which is a component of emotion in the user experience. According to Yang & Chen (2008), reflexive interactions between users and products are related to memories of experiences arising from long-term interaction (as is the case in the present study), in which the product establishes a positive perception, making symbol of memories of happiness. In fact, the terracotta-colored product presents itself as part of the life story of these participants. Therefore, the relationship between user and the product, and the meaning that this relationship represents, is what probably resulted in a more positive emotional reaction with the terracotta-colored product, then represented in the ERC results.
According to Sonneveld & Schifferstein (2008), current experiences receive contributions from memories of past experiences. Furthermore, previous use of a product allows you to learn aspects of its characteristics, which are kept in long-term memory, contributing to a better perception of usability (Clarkson, 2008). This helps explain the better perceived usability results of a product of a specific colour, as opposed to the same product of a different colour.
Regarding emotional reactions, Alves et al. (2022) evaluated different kitchen utensils (garlic peeler) in red, green and grey colours, using physiological protocols (FaceReaderTM) and self-report (SUS and preference scale), with middle-aged women (30-55 years). In this last protocol (preference scale), the grey product was worse evaluated (p ≤ 0.01), when compared to the products in red and green colours. And, specifically regarding the perception of usability, Bonfim et al. (2023) identified that, for senior individuals (men and women between 55-75 years), the perceived effort to open transparent mineral water packaging was significantly lower (p≤0.05), compared to packaging with a non-traditional colour (red); and also in relation to the younger user group (18-29 years). Despite the fact that these are different groups of users and different protocols, we can state that the results of these studies corroborate our findings; and suggest that the application of colour for this category of products needs to be well planned, controlling the Design process so that it does not cause a negative impact on the interaction of use. Furthermore, it is important to highlight that such findings do not simply serve to identify the best (or worst) colour to be applied in the design of a specific product, but rather to confirm that colours imply different emotional and usability conditions (the which confirms the findings of other studies) and, mainly, safely indicates that the long-term memory factor seems to have been preponderant in this case. Thus, these results corroborate the statement that the application of colours in product design, whose potential users are older, should be treated as a factor of inclusivity for these individuals, which is recommended by Moreira da Silva (2013).
5. Conclusion
Colour is an essential component of product design, and the results of the present study indicate that it influences emotional response and perceived usability. In this sense, the application of colours in product design, especially in cases where the main users are older people, must consider long-term memories, mainly aiming to expand the inclusive character of the design.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of CNPq - Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Grant - 308121/2022-8); by CIAUD – Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and Design, Lisbon School of Architecture, ULisboa, and by FCT – Foundation for the Science and Technology, Portugal.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright statement
Articles published in Convergences – Journal of Research and Arts Education are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. Detailed information about the license is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Under this license, users are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercially.
These freedoms are granted under the following terms:
Attribution — Appropriate credit must be given to the author(s), a link to the license must be provided, and any changes made to the original work must be indicated. Attribution may be provided in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests that the author(s) or licensor endorse the user or the use of the work.
No additional restrictions — No legal terms or technological measures may be applied that legally restrict others from doing anything permitted by the license.
Access to all articles published in Convergences is immediate and free of charge and does not require registration. Articles may be read, downloaded, copied, distributed, printed, searched, linked to, processed for indexing or used for any other lawful purpose in accordance with the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.
-
Copyright remains with the author(s). Authors grant Convergences the right of first publication. Articles are published under the CC BY 4.0 license, which permits sharing and adaptation for any purpose, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s) and the original publication in Convergences.
-
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in Convergences, including its publication in a revised or expanded form or as part of a book or anthology, provided that the original publication in Convergences is appropriately acknowledged.
-
Authors may distribute and use their published articles for teaching and research purposes and may deposit them in institutional or other repositories and academic networks. Self-archiving is permitted, provided that the original publication in Convergences is appropriately acknowledged.
Warranties
The author warrants that the submitted manuscript is original, has not previously been published, and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts derived from the same study or research must represent substantially distinct contributions and must not constitute redundant or duplicate publication.
The author warrants that they hold the necessary rights to submit and publish the manuscript and that all individuals listed as authors meet the journal's authorship criteria. All authors must have approved the submitted version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission to Convergences.
The corresponding author confirms, on behalf of all co-authors, that the authorship information is accurate and that all authors have agreed to the submission and publication of the manuscript.
The author warrants that the manuscript does not unlawfully infringe copyright, privacy, confidentiality or other third-party rights and accepts responsibility for obtaining any permissions required for publication.
Third party copyright
When an article contains copyrighted material held by third parties, including illustrations, figures, diagrams or other content, authors must ensure that its use complies with applicable copyright law and any relevant licensing conditions. Authors are responsible for obtaining any necessary permissions to reproduce or use third-party material included in their manuscripts.
References
Akoglu, H. (2018). User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(03): 91-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
Alismail, S., & Zhang, H. (2020). Exploring and Understanding Participants’ Perceptions of Facial Emoji Likert Scales in Online Surveys: A Qualitative Study. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 3(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382505
Alves, A. L., De Giuli, M. R., Zitkus, E., & Paschoarelli, L. C. (2022). Color influence on the use satisfaction of kitchen utensils: An ergonomic and perceptual study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 90, 103314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103314
Aslam, M. (2023) Cochran’s Q test for analyzing categorical data under uncertainty. Journal of Big Data, 10, 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-023-00823-3
Bonfim, G. H. C., Moreira da Silva, F., & Paschoarelli, L. C. (2023) The influence of colour on the effort perception during the opening of mineral water packages with screw caps. Convergences – Journal of Research and Arts Education, 16(32), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.53681/c1514225187514391s.32.180
Clarkson, J. (2008) Human capability and product design. In: Hekkert, P., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. Product Experience. Amsterdã, Elsevier Science, 165-198 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50009-5
Comerlato, P. H., Silva, S. D. S., Ziegler, N. D. S., Capp, E., & Nienov, O. H. (2020). Métodos estatísticos para desfechos qualitativos. Bioestatística quantitativa aplicada. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 2020. Cap. 6, 101-124.
Csillag, P. (2015) Comunicação com cores: uma abordagem científica pela perceção visual. São Paulo: SENAI-SP Editora/ESPM.
Desmet, P. M. A. (2018) Measuring emotion: Development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: M. BLYTHE and A. MONK (Eds.) Funology 2: From usability to enjoyment, Human–Computer Interaction Series, pp. 391-404. Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68213-6_25
Ding, M., Song, M., Pei, H., & Cheng, Y. (2021) The emotional design of product color: An eye movement and event‐related potentials study. Color Research & Application, 46, 871-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22614
Haaksma, T. R., Jong, M. T., & Karreman, J. (2018) Users’ Personal Conceptions of Usability and User Experience of Electronic and Software Products. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(02), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2795398
Heller, E. (2017). A Psicologia das Cores: Como as Cores Afetam a Emoção e a Razão. 1ed. São Paulo, Gustavo Gili.
Moreira da Silva, F. (2013). Colour and Inclusivity: a visual communication design project with older people (1st ed.). Lisbon: Caleidoscópio.
Na, N., & Suk, H. J. (2014). The emotional characteristics of white for applications of product color design. International Journal of Design, 08(02), 61-70, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04798-0_20
Pembury Smith, M.Q.R., & Ruxton, G.D. (2020) Effective use of the McNemar test. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 74, 133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02916-y
Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., & Serdar, M. A. (2021) Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia Medica (Zagreb), 31(01): 010502. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2021.010502
Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2010). The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: Effects on user performance and perceived usability. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.002
Sonneveld, M. H., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2008) The tactual experience of objetcs. In: Hekkert P., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. Product Experience. Amsterdã, Elsevier Science, 41-67.
Unruh, G. U., & Canciglieri Junior, O. (2018). Human and User-Centered Design Product Development: a Literature Review and Reflections. Series Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering - Transdisciplinary Engineering Methods for Social Innovation of Industry 4.0. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-898-3-211
Yang, X., & Chen, C. (2008) Emotional interaction in product design. 9th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, 51-54. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDCD.2008.4730517